Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kensington Computer Products Group
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to ACCO Brands. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 13:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Kensington Computer Products Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I declined an A7 speedy deletion nomination because the article provides a valid, albeit promotional-sounding, claim of significance, but source searches are not demonstrating that the company meets WP:CORPDEPTH. North America1000 04:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to ACCO Brands would suffice here I think. The Kensington lock is notable and has its own article. There doesn't appear to be much to say about this entity that isn't already covered in the ACCO article. --Michig (talk) 07:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The lock is indeed more notable than the company, a rather unusual situation--the rest of the ir products are minor accessories, but that particular one became a standard. DGG ( talk ) 04:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to ACCO Brands to avoid recreation. K.e.coffman (talk) 14:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment (from nominator): I am fine with a redirect to ACCO Brands. North America1000 08:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.