Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Blackham (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Denis Blackham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously survived AfD when criteria was less strict for his 'client list', however notability is not inherited and I don't see much individual notability for this mastering engineer. Additionally the article has been edited multiple times by the subject which is a conflict of interest. InDimensional (talk) 20:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and England. InDimensional (talk) 20:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: BLP. Fails GNG and NBIO. The sources do not meet WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth. Found nothing that meets SIRS from independent non-promotional sources addressing the subject indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. // Timothy :: talk 08:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I am still alive and well, so why should my page be deleted. My page explains my career and life. Nothing wrong with that.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Skyemastering (talk • contribs)
- Delete per WP:SIGCOV. Two of the sources are reliable, but mere lists; the other two are not reliable. Even if everything is true, as attested by the subject, does not mean they are notable enough for an article. We have a problem with WP:AUTO here. In 2007, this was allowed; in 2024, everyone knows we have certain standards. Bearian (talk) 18:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.